用于比较城市公园娱乐服务的绩效评估指标

Parks can offer varied services to human well-being, including recreational services (RS); however, there is insufficient understanding of park differences concerning the actual performance of their variedTo fill this gap, this study aimed to develop a set of performance indicators as a tool for comparing the functional efficacy of RS among different parks. The indicators covered three aspects of RS: recreational usage of various physical activities, their recreational satisfaction level and the collective performance rating. These indicators were applied in a case study of four parks in Guangzhou, China, based upon on-site observation and a questionnaire survey. The functional difference of these indicators was compared and the collective indicator was found to be able to effectively capture different efficacies of urban parks in supporting varied RS. Results show all the parks were far from reaching the maximum performance of designed RS, so it is worthy of consideration by urban managers to further improve their RS efficacy. In addition, the overall spatial design and configuration were inferred to be essential for improving the RS efficacy of urban parks, but not park size nor ornamental vegetation. The findings offered valuable evidence for the optimal spatial design and management of urban parks.

公园可以为人类福祉提供多种服务，包括娱乐服务（RS）；然而，目前还没有足够的了解公园的差异与实际表现的不同rs。为了填补这一空白，本研究旨在开发一套绩效将指标作为比较RS功能疗效的工具不同的公园。这些指标涵盖了RS的三个方面：娱乐性使用的各种体育活动，他们的娱乐性使用满意度水平和集体绩效评级。这些这些指标被应用于对广州的四个公园的案例研究中，中国，基于现场观察和问卷调查。这个比较了这些指标的功能差异集体指标被发现能够有效地捕获城市公园对支持不同RS的不同效果。结果显示所有的公园都远没有达到最大的性能设计了RS，因此值得城市管理者加以考虑进一步提高其RS的疗效。此外，整体空间分布设计和配置被推断为是必要的改进城市公园的RS功效，但不包括公园大小和观赏植被。研究结果为优化空间设计提供了有价值的证据以及对城市公园的管理。